https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104377
--- Comment #4 from Feng Xue ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #2)
> (In reply to Feng Xue from comment #1)
> >
> > OK. I does missed something. Here we could not hold assumption that
> > ipcp_decision_stage() only sees raw cgraph
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104377
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
By the way, it would be good to invent some (slightly?) more intuitive API for
ipa_param_adjustments adjustments, merging and similar operations. I simply
left it for later when I hoped I would have a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104377
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Feng Xue from comment #1)
>
> OK. I does missed something. Here we could not hold assumption that
> ipcp_decision_stage() only sees raw cgraph node, since sometime in the
> future some new ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104377
--- Comment #1 from Feng Xue ---
(In reply to Feng Xue from comment #0)
> For function create_specialized_node(), the "node" to operated on seems
> always to be an original cgraph node, never a clone node. From call graph
> related to the
