https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108470
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108470
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108470
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b6b7d615543d73381cb1f994825d9bca024c838
commit r14-8261-g9b6b7d615543d73381cb1f994825d9bca024c838
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108470
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Yes, noipa attribute is there for some time and I think we commit to support it
in the future.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108470
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw ---
The manual entry for this says "This attribute is supported mainly for the
purpose
of testing the compiler." which suggests a lack of long-term commitment to the
option. Perhaps it would be better to rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108470
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Apparently, we support 'noipa' attribute for more than 5 years and so it should
be used rather than noiline attribute. Or do you need to support an older
toolchain as well?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108470
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
