https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, for me GCC 12.3 takes 170s for the compile.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95e5c38a98cc64a797b1d766a20f8c0d0c807a74
commit r14-1429-g95e5c38a98cc64a797b1d766a20f8c0d0c807a74
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.3.0
--- Comment #13 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Bad:
Samples: 4M of event 'cycles:u', Event count (approx.): 6574968845607
Overhead Samples Command Shared Object Symbol
59.44% 2803407 cc1 cc1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 55213
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55213=edit
prototype patch
Trying to fix that (again - I usually break correctness here :/) this
would result in
ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Unsurprisingly, for the full testcase on current trunk with release checking:
ipa points-to :1080.80 (100%) 0.56 ( 47%)1081.52 (100%)
9739k ( 4%)
TOTAL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-05-30
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #7)
> Original packet-rnsap.c.i.xz takes 27 minutes to compile for me.
>
> The hack below cuts this time down to 9 minutes (slashes 60% of runtime).
Or maybe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Original packet-rnsap.c.i.xz takes 27 minutes to compile for me.
The hack below cuts this time down to 9 minutes (slashes 60% of runtime).
The considerable amount of time is spent looking up the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 55174
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55174=edit
packet-rnsap-shrunk-slightly.c.i.xz
packet-rnsap-shrunk-slightly.c.i.xz is a slightly shrunk version of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
> For me it finishes in 3 minutes on gcc-14.
I'll take it back. It does not finish for me in 10 minutes on gcc-14. Don't
know where I picked the number.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
I know what the option does, but:
1. It's substantially slower in 12/13/14, with or without checking. If that's
expected, that's fine, but someone has to say if it is.
2. With default checking (=release) on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
--- Comment #2 from Sam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
I let perf spin for a while and got this w/ 13:
```
$ perf record gcc-13 -O2 -fipa-pta -c packet-rnsap.c.i
[^C'd after ~2 minutes]
$ perf report
43.18% cc1 cc1 [.]
15 matches
Mail list logo
