https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #33 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #29)
> A minor rant, but why can't all this be set up automatically in the compile
> farm machines?
We have everything installed with the default for whatever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #32 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #31)
> > --- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> [...]
> > Ok, what's the minimum configuration I need to build here?
> >
> > srcdir/configure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez ---
[...]
> Ok, what's the minimum configuration I need to build here?
>
> srcdir/configure --build=sparc-sun-solaris2.11
>
> srcdir/configure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #30 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #29)
> > > gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/home/aldyh/bld/clean'
> > > Comparing stages 2 and 3
> > > Bootstrap comparison failure!
> > > gcc/tree-vect-stmts.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #28)
> > --- Comment #27 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> > This is in cfarm216.cfarm.et:
> >
> > aldyh@s11-sparc:~/bld/clean$ hostname
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #28 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #27 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> This is in cfarm216.cfarm.et:
>
> aldyh@s11-sparc:~/bld/clean$ hostname
> s11-sparc.cfarm
> aldyh@s11-sparc:~/bld/clean$ uname -a
> SunOS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #27 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #26)
> > --- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> > prange has been enabled again, after testing on x86-64 and ppc64le linux.
> > Aarch has no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> prange has been enabled again, after testing on x86-64 and ppc64le linux.
> Aarch has no space to run tests on the compile farm, and sparc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez ---
prange has been enabled again, after testing on x86-64 and ppc64le linux.
Aarch has no space to run tests on the compile farm, and sparc bootstrap was
already broken.
The problem in this PR can be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #24 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8e3574e68310f68116f157a35d5650600d13718
commit r15-574-gb8e3574e68310f68116f157a35d5650600d13718
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6bed6d3fcc13880ffa786b6c616e2306efe2bf3
commit r15-573-gf6bed6d3fcc13880ffa786b6c616e2306efe2bf3
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #22 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #20)
Thanks for looking into this.
> The IL we generate the jump function from is:
>
> _1 = cclauses_2(D) != 0B;
> c_parser_omp_all_clauses (_1);
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #20)
> (I also cannot prevent myself from ranting a little that it would
> really help if all the ranger (helper) classes and functions were
> better documented.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #20 from Martin Jambor ---
The IL we generate the jump function from is:
_1 = cclauses_2(D) != 0B;
c_parser_omp_all_clauses (_1);
Which translates to the expected jump function:
callsite void c_parser_omp_teams(int**)/3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #19 from Martin Jambor ---
The following minimized testcase ICEs with r15-312-g36e877996936ab
cross-compiler to ppc64le with -O2 nicely:
void omp_clause_elt_check(int *, const char *, const char *);
enum { C_OMP_CLAUSE_SPLIT_COUNT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #18 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Ah, it looks like seurer already beat me to the preprocessed source.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #17 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #16)
> I'll have look, hopefully on Monday.
Thanks Martin.
To reproduce the problem:
1. Revert this patch:
commit d7bb8eaade3cd3aa70715c8567b4d7b08098e699
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #16 from Martin Jambor ---
I'll have look, hopefully on Monday.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #11)
> I have reverted the prange enabling patch until the IPA pass is fixed.
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka ---
So this is problem in ipa_value_range_from_jfunc?
It is Maritn's code, I hope he will know why types are wrong here.
Once can get type compatibility problem on mismatched declarations and LTO, but
it seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> Created attachment 58168
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58168=edit
> proposed patch in testing
I just tried
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 58168
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58168=edit
proposed patch in testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I have reverted the prange enabling patch until the IPA pass is fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #9)
> The patch in comment 6 succeeds for me, but it seems more of a heavy-handed
> band-aid that confirms the symptom, but covers up the problem.
>
> Something
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #9 from David Edelsohn ---
The patch in comment 6 succeeds for me, but it seems more of a heavy-handed
band-aid that confirms the symptom, but covers up the problem.
Something in GCC apparently has generated invalid IR that was not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
tests ran OK too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried that and with it trunk did finish building. I am running a test of
that now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I wonder if something like this would work.
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-cp.cc b/gcc/ipa-cp.cc
index 5781f50..ea8a685 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-cp.cc
+++ b/gcc/ipa-cp.cc
@@ -1730,6 +1730,8 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
29 matches
Mail list logo
