http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon May 5 23:27:40 2014
New Revision: 210086
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/60965
* ipa-devirt.c (get_class_context): Allow POD to chan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon May 5 19:40:34 2014
New Revision: 210079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210079&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/60965
* g++.dg/ipa/devirt-31.C: New testcase.
* g++.dg/i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Andrew Haley from comment #11)
> (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #9)
> > As far as I know people always use char arrays for placement new anyway; at
> > least all the examples I've ever s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka ---
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
>
> --- Comment #11 from Andrew Haley ---
> (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Andrew Haley from comment #8)
> > > While it's true
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4)
> > Mine, probably 4.9 regression, too.
>
> It is, and Jonathan Wakely's earlier reduction exposes it on 4.9 too.
>
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Haley ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #9)
> (In reply to Andrew Haley from comment #8)
> > While it's true that we can play hardball on this one by insisting that only
> > char arrays should be used with pla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Andrew Haley from comment #8)
> While it's true that we can play hardball on this one by insisting that only
> char arrays should be used with placement new, it wouldn't really do any
> good. I d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Haley ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #7)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
> > It is a bit
> > questionable on how precisely define what type transitions are allowed by
> > placement new. This is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am testing the attached patch.
Index: ipa-devirt.c
===
--- ipa-devirt.c(revision 209913)
+++ ipa-devirt.c(working copy)
@@ -1137,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Haley ---
Jan, can we please have an ETA to fix this? It is a very importantant problem
for Java because it breaks OpenJDK.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
17 matches
Mail list logo
