https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #36 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 10 17:28:59 2014
New Revision: 215134
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215134&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/61659
* decl.c (grokfndecl): Don't set DECL_COMDAT on stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #34 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 10 14:27:40 2014
New Revision: 215131
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215131&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/53808
PR c++/61659
* decl2.c (note_comdat_fn): New.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #33 from John David Anglin ---
The issue in comment 32 was introduced in revision 214177
.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jason at redhat dot com|
--- Comment #31 from Jason Merri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #30 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 4 12:37:05 2014
New Revision: 214900
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214900&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/61659
* decl.c (duplicate_decls): Check DECL_DECLARED_INLI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #29 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #28)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #27)
> > Possible fix:
>
> Applied to trunk, thanks.
The fix isn't in trunk yet. Forgot to push?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #28 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #27)
> Possible fix:
Applied to trunk, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #27 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Possible fix:
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index d03f8a4707e5..d8fb35e21237 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -2215,7 +2215,7 @@ duplicate_decls (tree newdecl, tree oldde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #26 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
ยง14.7.3/12 says:
An explicit specialization of a function template is inline only if it is
declared with the inline specifier or defined as deleted, and independently of
whether its function template i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #25 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #24)
> Created attachment 33407 [details]
> Patch for 4.9
>
> Here's a patch for the 4.9 branch. I'm nervous about applying it because I
> suspect that we have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #24 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 33407
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33407&action=edit
Patch for 4.9
Here's a patch for the 4.9 branch. I'm nervous about applying it because I
suspect that we have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
Summary|[4.9/5 Regr
14 matches
Mail list logo
