[Bug ipa/64481] [5 Regression] r219076 breaks bootstrap (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

2015-01-15 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64481 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/64481] [5 Regression] r219076 breaks bootstrap (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

2015-01-13 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64481 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Jan 14 03:47:17 2015 New Revision: 219572 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219572&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/64481 * ipa-inline-analysis.c (node_growth_cache): Remove.

[Bug ipa/64481] [5 Regression] r219076 breaks bootstrap (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

2015-01-13 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64481 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 34441 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34441&action=edit Proposed fix I am testing the attached patch. Seems that it has no negaitve impact on firefox linktime.

[Bug ipa/64481] [5 Regression] r219076 breaks bootstrap (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

2015-01-13 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64481 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- OK, there are at least two issues. First is that we mix up alias with its target (i.e. clear caches on alias instead of alias target) and second that we still use node growth cache in some cases. Major use in t

[Bug ipa/64481] [5 Regression] r219076 breaks bootstrap (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

2015-01-13 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64481 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug ipa/64481] [5 Regression] r219076 breaks bootstrap (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

2015-01-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64481 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- I've reproduced the bootstrap failure with r219533. Did you mean r219536?

[Bug ipa/64481] [5 Regression] r219076 breaks bootstrap (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

2015-01-13 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64481 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- The comment is no longer valid, because no updates are made inside of the ifdef block. What probably happens is that the edge growth cache is not up to date but the problem is not noticed by the sanity check.

[Bug ipa/64481] [5 Regression] r219076 breaks bootstrap (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

2015-01-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64481 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/64481] [5 Regression] r219076 breaks bootstrap (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

2015-01-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64481 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug ipa/64481] [5 Regression] r219076 breaks bootstrap (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

2015-01-08 Thread maltsevm at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64481 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug ipa/64481] [5 Regression] r219076 breaks bootstrap (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

2015-01-04 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64481 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka --- Bootstrap worked for me yesterday. I guess disable-checking may be the reason, I will try to reproduce this.

[Bug ipa/64481] [5 Regression] r219076 breaks bootstrap (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

2015-01-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64481 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0