https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64963
Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64963
James Greenhalgh jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-none-elf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64963
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64963
--- Comment #4 from James Greenhalgh jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The warning message given by the kernel build is:
WARNING: net/ipv4/built-in.o(.text.unlikely+0x10c): Section mismatch in
reference from the function ip_auto_config.part.6()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64963
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think cloning into the same section make as much sense as not doing it. That
is, I see valid uses for both behaviors.
We've been cloning not to the same section since quite a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64963
James Greenhalgh jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
