https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jan 8 12:34:34 2016
New Revision: 232160
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232160&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 68851] Do not collect thunks in collect_callers
2016-01-08 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jan 8 12:30:56 2016
New Revision: 232159
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232159&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 68851] Do not collect thunks in collect_callers
2016-01-08 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor ---
So the bug is basically fixed but I'd like to commit the patch to gcc 5 branch
and an equivalent to 4.9 branch. Testing is in progress, I 'll close the bug
after the patches are in.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Dec 15 13:07:15 2015
New Revision: 231648
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231648&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 68851] Do not collect thunks in collect_callers
2015-12-15 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor ---
I have proposed a fix on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01423.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Thanks Markus for reduction of the test-case.
For the minimized test, the constrop clone has properly unset a comdat group.
Comdat group for the node:
_ZNK1G20isFormControlElementEv.constprop.0/10 () @0x7fff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 37002
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37002&action=edit
unreduced testcase
Reducing is very slow. Here is the unreduced testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
>
> --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
> So the mentioned revision is responsible for creation of a new consprop clone:
>
> IPA decision stage:
> ...
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
So the mentioned revision is responsible for creation of a new consprop clone:
IPA decision stage:
...
- Creating a specialized node of virtual bool
blink::HTMLFormControlElement::isFormControlElement() cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Caused by r231540:
commit 15a1fce36358508909f2013fd6d07e0b9fcad97a
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Dec 10 19:20:14 2015 +
* ipa-cp.c (ipcp_cloning_candidate_p): Use node->optimize_for_size_p.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Still reducing. But Martin emailed me a patch, that fixes the issue:
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-comdats.c b/gcc/ipa-comdats.c
index 3aabd71..f7a6ff4 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-comdats.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-comdats.c
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68851
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
15 matches
Mail list logo
