https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80899
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80899
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
The problem here is that after gimplification we make no distinction between
original pointer and pointer returned by placement new. If one can placement
new different type to object into arbitrary field of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80899
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80899
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80899
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka