[Bug ipa/91088] IPA-cp cost evaluation is too conservative for "if (f(param) cmp const_val)" condition

2022-05-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91088 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Dimitar Dimitrov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:addacdc87b044e63d72054036907c91a18be6734 commit r13-699-gaddacdc87b044e63d72054036907c91a18be6734 Author: Dimitar Dimitrov

[Bug ipa/91088] IPA-cp cost evaluation is too conservative for "if (f(param) cmp const_val)" condition

2019-11-13 Thread fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91088 Feng Xue changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/91088] IPA-cp cost evaluation is too conservative for "if (f(param) cmp const_val)" condition

2019-10-16 Thread fxue at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91088 --- Comment #4 from fxue at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: fxue Revision: 277054 Modified property: svn:log Modified: svn:log at Wed Oct 16 07:41:24 2019 -- --- svn:log

[Bug ipa/91088] IPA-cp cost evaluation is too conservative for "if (f(param) cmp const_val)" condition

2019-08-15 Thread fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91088 --- Comment #3 from Feng Xue --- I've already created a patch under review. Please give some comments. Here it is: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg00959.html

[Bug ipa/91088] IPA-cp cost evaluation is too conservative for "if (f(param) cmp const_val)" condition

2019-08-15 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91088 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/91088] IPA-cp cost evaluation is too conservative for "if (f(param) cmp const_val)" condition

2019-07-04 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91088 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- I am surprised we don't have a match.pd transformation for v * 2 < 6 with undefined overflow. But that's only a side remark, not important for your report.