https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94360
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Well, if the current behavior is a good one (I have not looked at how
size/performance trade-off works out) then I am also fine declaring this bug
invalid.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94360
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94360
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
LNT can still see this, on the zen2 and zen3 machine at least:
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=700.337.0&plot.1=711.337.0&plot.2=740.337.0&plot.3=694.337.0&;
https://lnt.opensuse.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94360
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
PR94410 is another O2 PGO+LTO bug where g:2925cad2151 caused a slowdown.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94360
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Unfortunately, the mentioned configuration is not tested on LNT periodic
benchmarks.
