[Bug java/26097] [4.2 regression]: Libjava failed to build

2006-02-04 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 23:30 --- Fix checked in. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|N

[Bug java/26097] [4.2 regression]: Libjava failed to build

2006-02-04 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 23:30 --- Subject: Bug 26097 Author: tromey Date: Sat Feb 4 23:30:01 2006 New Revision: 110598 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110598 Log: PR java/26097: * expr.c (push_type): Avoid sid

[Bug java/26097] [4.2 regression]: Libjava failed to build

2006-02-04 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 22:26 --- build completes with the patch from Tom. (#8) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26097

[Bug java/26097] [4.2 regression]: Libjava failed to build

2006-02-04 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug java/26097] [4.2 regression]: Libjava failed to build

2006-02-04 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 21:53 --- Created an attachment (id=10778) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10778&action=view) proposed patch Please try this patch. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26097

[Bug java/26097] [4.2 regression]: Libjava failed to build

2006-02-04 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 21:49 --- At least the change in push_type is wrong. Perhaps others too, I'm looking. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26097

[Bug java/26097] [4.2 regression]: Libjava failed to build

2006-02-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 20:21 --- CCing Ben as I think his abort -> gcc_assert patch caused this. I suspect one of the conversion caused a side effect to be removed when doing --disable-checking (which disables also the asserts). -- pinskia at gc

[Bug java/26097] [4.2 regression]: Libjava failed to build

2006-02-04 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #5 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-04 20:05 --- Yes, I used --disable-checking. I saw it on i686, x86-64 and ia64. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26097

[Bug java/26097] [4.2 regression]: Libjava failed to build

2006-02-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 20:01 --- Reproduces with --disable-checking but not without on x86_64. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26097

[Bug java/26097] [4.2 regression]: Libjava failed to build

2006-02-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 19:47 --- Quick question, what options did you use to bootstrap (Please say --disable-checking)? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug java/26097] [4.2 regression]: Libjava failed to build

2006-02-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 19:36 --- I am going to put this into the java component as this is reproducible on i686, x86_64 and powerpc64. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---