[Bug java/9369] wrong bytecode generated for static inner class with private constructor

2007-01-09 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 20:44 --- All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge. I'm mass-closing the affected PRs. If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it with a note explaining why. Thanks. -- t

[Bug java/9369] wrong bytecode generated for static inner class with private constructor

2005-09-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor Last reconfirmed|2004-05-20 23:41:11 |2005-09-30 13:33:55 date|

[Bug java/9369] wrong bytecode generated for static inner class with private constructor

2005-05-13 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-13 23:27 --- This no longer fails due to a change that went in as part of the fix for PR 8618. In particular, we now emit the 'Inner' constructor as package-private, not private. This is kind of a slacker approach to im

[Bug java/9369] wrong bytecode generated for static inner class with private constructor

2005-05-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-12 02:03 --- Hmm, even though GCJ -C produces the same bytecode for Outer as far as I can see, we now produce something which actually works with both gij and java (with -Xfuture). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug java/9369] wrong bytecode generated for static inner class with private constructor

2005-02-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10 00:26 --- *** Bug 19870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added