[Bug libffi/20730] Assembler illegal subtraction in libffi on Solaris 8 Intel

2010-04-28 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 21:02 --- Mine. -- ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc

[Bug libffi/20730] Assembler illegal subtraction in libffi on Solaris 8 Intel

2010-04-28 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 21:03 --- Dup of PR libffi/26048. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26048 *** -- ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libffi/20730] Assembler illegal subtraction in libffi on Solaris 8 Intel

2005-04-03 Thread pfelecan at acm dot org
--- Additional Comments From pfelecan at acm dot org 2005-04-03 13:38 --- (In reply to comment #9) Ok for the preprocessed source line 91 for the preproceser source: .long .LFB1-. assembled on Solaris 10 Intel: /usr/ccs/bin/as -V -Qy -s -o sysv.o sysv.s as: Sun Compiler Common 10

[Bug libffi/20730] Assembler illegal subtraction in libffi on Solaris 8 Intel

2005-04-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |libffi Keywords||build

[Bug libffi/20730] Assembler illegal subtraction in libffi on Solaris 8 Intel

2005-04-02 Thread pfelecan at acm dot org
--- Additional Comments From pfelecan at acm dot org 2005-04-02 16:10 --- Created an attachment (id=8515) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8515action=view) compiler run with verbose flag -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20730

[Bug libffi/20730] Assembler illegal subtraction in libffi on Solaris 8 Intel

2005-04-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-02 16:12 --- This does not make sense as line 91 is the following: jne retdouble Also what happens if you use GNU binutils instead of the tool chain from Sun? --

[Bug libffi/20730] Assembler illegal subtraction in libffi on Solaris 8 Intel

2005-04-02 Thread pfelecan at acm dot org
--- Additional Comments From pfelecan at acm dot org 2005-04-02 16:12 --- Created an attachment (id=8516) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8516action=view) preprocessor run this phases obtains the source fed to the assembler --

[Bug libffi/20730] Assembler illegal subtraction in libffi on Solaris 8 Intel

2005-04-02 Thread pfelecan at acm dot org
--- Additional Comments From pfelecan at acm dot org 2005-04-02 16:13 --- Created an attachment (id=8517) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8517action=view) the assembler output -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20730

[Bug libffi/20730] Assembler illegal subtraction in libffi on Solaris 8 Intel

2005-04-02 Thread pfelecan at acm dot org
--- Additional Comments From pfelecan at acm dot org 2005-04-02 16:13 --- Created an attachment (id=8518) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8518action=view) the preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20730

[Bug libffi/20730] Assembler illegal subtraction in libffi on Solaris 8 Intel

2005-04-02 Thread pfelecan at acm dot org
--- Additional Comments From pfelecan at acm dot org 2005-04-02 16:14 --- Created an attachment (id=8519) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8519action=view) the configuration log for the library -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20730

[Bug libffi/20730] Assembler illegal subtraction in libffi on Solaris 8 Intel

2005-04-02 Thread pfelecan at acm dot org
--- Additional Comments From pfelecan at acm dot org 2005-04-02 16:16 --- (In reply to comment #3) This does not make sense as line 91 is the following: jne retdouble Also what happens if you use GNU binutils instead of the tool chain from Sun? The line 91 is in the

[Bug libffi/20730] Assembler illegal subtraction in libffi on Solaris 8 Intel

2005-04-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-02 16:18 --- Ok for the preprocessed source line 91 for the preproceser source: .long .LFB1-. This is valid as far as I know. Again can you try with the GNU binutils. --

[Bug libffi/20730] Assembler illegal subtraction in libffi on Solaris 8 Intel

2005-04-02 Thread pfelecan at acm dot org
--- Additional Comments From pfelecan at acm dot org 2005-04-02 16:23 --- (In reply to comment #9) Ok for the preprocessed source line 91 for the preproceser source: .long .LFB1-. This is valid as far as I know. Again can you try with the GNU binutils. Unfortunately, for the