[Bug libffi/40807] [4.5 Regression] : libffi.call/return_sc.c

2010-03-22 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- davek at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40807

[Bug libffi/40807] [4.5 Regression] : libffi.call/return_sc.c

2009-07-24 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-24 10:22 --- Fixed at r.150042. -- davek at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|A

[Bug libffi/40807] [4.5 Regression] : libffi.call/return_sc.c

2009-07-24 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-24 10:12 --- Subject: Bug 40807 Author: davek Date: Fri Jul 24 10:12:16 2009 New Revision: 150042 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150042 Log: PR libffi/40807 * src/x86/ffi.c (ffi_prep_cif_mac

[Bug libffi/40807] [4.5 Regression] : libffi.call/return_sc.c

2009-07-20 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-20 14:43 --- Created an attachment (id=18231) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18231&action=view) final spin Turns out that '#' makes a bad choice of comment introducer if the next word is "if" and you're runnin

[Bug libffi/40807] [4.5 Regression] : libffi.call/return_sc.c

2009-07-20 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-20 14:31 --- Created an attachment (id=18230) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18230&action=view) Updated patch Now with a trivial tweak to fix a missing-prototype warning. -- davek at gcc dot gnu dot org ch

[Bug libffi/40807] [4.5 Regression] : libffi.call/return_sc.c

2009-07-20 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-20 14:11 --- Created an attachment (id=18229) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18229&action=view) proposed fix This patch fixes all the significant FAILs currently extant in the libffi testsuite.

[Bug libffi/40807] [4.5 Regression] : libffi.call/return_sc.c

2009-07-19 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-20 01:27 --- Taking assignment. -- davek at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|u

[Bug libffi/40807] [4.5 Regression] : libffi.call/return_sc.c

2009-07-19 Thread dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-07-19 17:50 --- (In reply to comment #0) > I notice that ffi_call_SYSV has to handle all the return types, but not > ffi_closure_SYSV nor ffi_closure_raw_SYSV. Does anyone know why that is? To answer my own questio