https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #27 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac6a1181209b756882f89cdba6128565fad1a56e
commit r12-6580-gac6a1181209b756882f89cdba6128565fad1a56e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> A quick parallel make configure-target-libgfortran all-target-libfortran
> completed without issues. I've just fired off full bootstraps with that
> patch before going to bed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #25 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 52184
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52184=edit
> gcc12-pr104006.patch
>
> Fix. I've added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52184
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52184=edit
gcc12-pr104006.patch
Fix. I've added $(version_dep) to BUILT_SOURCES because I thought it is a
generated file like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, I finally understand.
gfortran.ver-sun is now (newly) in BUILT_SOURCES through $(version_dep).
And it depends on all the sources being built:
$(libgfortran_la_OBJECTS) $(libgfortran_la_LIBADD)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #22 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> That is make -j48 from where?
> Toplevel, or the libgfortran build dir, or toplevel make -j48
> all-target-libgfortran or make -j48
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is make -j48 from where?
Toplevel, or the libgfortran build dir, or toplevel make -j48
all-target-libgfortran or make -j48 maybe-all-target-libgfortran?
>From what I can see, toplevel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #20 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 52183
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52183=edit
i386-pc-solaris2.11 libgfortran make -j48 output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Some of the patches before #c13 were just buggy and could cause such errors.
> Do you see the above on vanilla trunk?
I do.
> Can you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Some of the patches before #c13 were just buggy and could cause such errors.
Do you see the above on vanilla trunk?
Can you perhaps patch your Makefile like:
all: $(BUILT_SOURCES) config.h
+ls -l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> The version file is now fixed.
Thanks.
> Can you perhaps rm -rf the libgfortran build directories and retry, if it
> wasn't some weird
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The version file is now fixed.
Can you perhaps rm -rf the libgfortran build directories and retry, if it
wasn't some weird BUILT_SOURCES problem caused by it failing early because of
the gfortran version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70ba28304b7ff91761db248bc8354eda8e9a4796
commit r12-6555-g70ba28304b7ff91761db248bc8354eda8e9a4796
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Anyway, let me commit the gfortran.ver-sun fix as obvious separately.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52180|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> That is weird.
> We have:
> ieee_arithmetic.lo: ieee/ieee_arithmetic.F90 ieee_exceptions.lo
> dependency and ieee_exceptions.mod is created
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is weird.
We have:
ieee_arithmetic.lo: ieee/ieee_arithmetic.F90 ieee_exceptions.lo
dependency and ieee_exceptions.mod is created when compiling
ieee_exceptions.lo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 52180
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52180=edit
> gcc12-pr104006.patch
>
> So yet another version.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52177|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
libgfortran/ieee/ieee_arithmetic.F90:#include "fpu-target.inc"
libgfortran/ieee/ieee_exceptions.F90:#include "fpu-target.inc"
libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90: include "selected_int_kind.inc"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #3)
>> Really strange. If kinds.h were missing completely at that point, I'd
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 52177
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52177=edit
> gcc12-pr104006.patch
>
> Updated patch.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #3)
> Really strange. If kinds.h were missing completely at that point, I'd
> expect gcc message to that effect, that's why I suspected the header
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52176|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 52176
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52176=edit
> gcc12-pr104006.patch
The patch lists gcc as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sorry, only added kinds.inc dependencies and not kinds.h.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104006
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
29 matches
Mail list logo
