https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6604a05fa27bc21c3409e767552daca3fcf43964
commit r15-4419-g6604a05fa27bc21c3409e767552daca3fcf43964
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #18 from Jerry DeL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
--- Comment #17 from Edwin Lu ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #16)
> Created attachment 58799 [details]
> Revised test case with careful precision and tolerance values.
>
> New suggested test case which passes on x86-64-linux.
We r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58715|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle ---
One other possible flaw in the test is comparison of floating point values. I
will tidy up this part with some tolerance.and post a new version of the test
here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6886f1c164af9381b4dd6c4d5202a3bbca225168
commit r15-2459-g6886f1c164af9381b4dd6c4d5202a3bbca225168
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #9)
> In some of my test runs (have not yet been able to deduce any pattern), I'm
> seeing this new test case FAIL its execution test:
>
Can you try this minor ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ewlu at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment #10 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I am not allowed to close this PR. (???) It is Resolved/Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3aeb697a2158d359d9f951f6c6c6bcd9c53c8c2f
commit r15-2320-g3aeb697a2158d359d9f951f6c6c6bcd9c53c8c2f
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 58715
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58715&action=edit
Proposed patch, still testing
The attached patch fixes this bug and passes regression testing. I want to try
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Bug 105361 depends on bug 105456, which changed state.
Bug 105456 Summary: Child I/O does not propage iostat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105456
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
As expected:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_read_8.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_read_8.f90 -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_read_8.f90 -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
This "fixes" the bug in question, but is almost certainly entirely
incorrect for a lot of other cases. Will have to look a bit further.
--- a/libgfortran/io/list_read.c
+++ b/libgfortran/io/list_read.c
@@
21 matches
Mail list logo