[Bug libfortran/106079] [12/13 regression] gfortran.dg/boz_15.f90 fails after r12-6498-g07c60b8e33

2022-08-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/106079] [12/13 regression] gfortran.dg/boz_15.f90 fails after r12-6498-g07c60b8e33

2022-08-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e5ca7ff8c9afd3c38245aa6b939cd3ae49bf1fe commit r12-8653-g4e5ca7ff8c9afd3c38245aa6b939cd3ae49bf1fe Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libfortran/106079] [12/13 regression] gfortran.dg/boz_15.f90 fails after r12-6498-g07c60b8e33

2022-08-01 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The fix worked fine in my testing on trunk. Thanks!

[Bug libfortran/106079] [12/13 regression] gfortran.dg/boz_15.f90 fails after r12-6498-g07c60b8e33

2022-08-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82ac4cd213867be939aedee15347e8fd3f200b6a commit r13-1913-g82ac4cd213867be939aedee15347e8fd3f200b6a Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug libfortran/106079] [12/13 regression] gfortran.dg/boz_15.f90 fails after r12-6498-g07c60b8e33

2022-07-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- And on the box I was working on this fix (Fedora 34, glibc 2.33) without the fix I see in ../configure --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-long-double-format=ieee --with-long-double-128 make

[Bug libfortran/106079] [12/13 regression] gfortran.dg/boz_15.f90 fails after r12-6498-g07c60b8e33

2022-07-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Strange, in my 12 branch distro (scratch) build the only differences with the patch are: -FAIL: gfortran.dg/boz_15.f90 -O0 execution test -FAIL: gfortran.dg/boz_15.f90 -O1 execution test -FAIL:

[Bug libfortran/106079] [12/13 regression] gfortran.dg/boz_15.f90 fails after r12-6498-g07c60b8e33

2022-07-29 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch causes a bunch of new failures: FAIL: gfortran.dg/c-interop/allocatable-dummy.f90 -Os execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/c-interop/allocate-errors.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL:

[Bug libfortran/106079] [12/13 regression] gfortran.dg/boz_15.f90 fails after r12-6498-g07c60b8e33

2022-07-29 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried the patch on trunk and it fixed the failure. I am trying a full make check there and with gcc 12.

[Bug libfortran/106079] [12/13 regression] gfortran.dg/boz_15.f90 fails after r12-6498-g07c60b8e33

2022-07-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libfortran/106079] [12/13 regression] gfortran.dg/boz_15.f90 fails after r12-6498-g07c60b8e33

2022-07-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106079 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-07-25