[Bug libfortran/18297] gfortran : file opening fails if only read access

2004-11-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-24 18:18 --- Just closing as a dup of bug 18653 (there was some talk about this on the mailing list). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18653 *** -- What|Removed

[Bug libfortran/18297] gfortran : file opening fails if only read access

2004-11-05 Thread mimo2 at free dot fr
--- Additional Comments From mimo2 at free dot fr 2004-11-05 09:15 --- I don't know what is the true fortran convention, but this code program test open(unit=10,file='test.txt',status='old') write(*,*) ' file is read' end works on g77 (and all the other

[Bug libfortran/18297] gfortran : file opening fails if only read access

2004-11-05 Thread mimo2 at free dot fr
--- Additional Comments From mimo2 at free dot fr 2004-11-05 17:51 --- I forgot to reopen the bug after my last comment. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/18297] gfortran : file opening fails if only read access

2004-11-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |libfortran Version|unknown |4.0.0

[Bug libfortran/18297] gfortran : file opening fails if only read access

2004-11-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-04 17:36 --- Do you have a simple example/testcase? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18297

[Bug libfortran/18297] gfortran : file opening fails if only read access

2004-11-04 Thread bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-04 23:21 --- gfortran runtime does not know that you only intend to write to the file. you need to add ACCESS='READ' to the open statement. With ACCESS set to read, a read only file can be opened. i do not think this

[Bug libfortran/18297] gfortran : file opening fails if only read access

2004-11-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 01:29 --- Yes this is invalid by reading the code. -- What|Removed |Added