--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-05 17:12
---
I don't understand why my build hadn't picked up the changes to io.h, which made
me miss the typo. Apart from that there's another inconsistency, cured by this
patch to trans-io.c. Can you test this please?
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-05 17:44
---
BTw the build issue is now PR 19273.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19194
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-05 19:39
---
*** Bug 16288 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-05 22:19 ---
Subject: Re: Missing RECL parameter in OPEN statement
Can you test this please?
2005-01-05 Tobias Schlueter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR fortran/19194
* trans-io.c
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 00:16
---
Sigh, indeed the type for the REC parameter is wrong as well. I had checked for
other wrongs, but due to unlucky formatting in io.h I missed this one.
Could you please try this patch to trans-io.c instead of
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 00:35
---
David (billingd) could you please test this last patch on MIPS if John David's
(danglin) testing turns out to be successful? I could then submit it (+ cleanups
to io.h) tomorrow.
--
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-06 04:36 ---
Subject: Re: Missing RECL parameter in OPEN statement
Could you please try this patch to trans-io.c instead of the previous one?
2005-01-05 Tobias Schlueter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-05 00:02
---
Can you attach the .t02.original dump (generated with -fdump-tree-original)
please. I have an idea what might be going wrong, but I'd like to see what this
looks like on your target.
--
What
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-01-05 02:01 ---
Subject: Re: Missing RECL parameter in OPEN statement
Can you please give this a spin? The library used int where the compiler
used
INTEGER*4 in a few cases. I'm currently running the testsuite
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-05
03:40 ---
Looks as if the problem relates to the initialization or lack of the
_gfortran_ioparm struct:
(gdb) p (st_parameter)_gfortran_ioparm
$14 = {unit = 0, err = 0, end = 0, eor = 0, list_format = 0,
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-05
04:22 ---
Ignore the last comment. Gdb is confused.
The fundamental problem is the following. Here is the code generated
to save the recl_in field in MAIN__. A store double word insn is being
used to store the
--- Additional Comments From bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-30
01:24 ---
this is a run time library bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
12 matches
Mail list logo
