--- Comment #25 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-13 06:31 ---
Fixed (cf. comment 24) the warning of comment 21 and comment 23. If a new
warning is spotted, feel free to open a new PR or reopen this PR.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #24 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-13 06:26 ---
Subject: Bug 22423
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jul 13 06:26:38 2009
New Revision: 149545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149545
Log:
2009-07-12 Tobias Burnus
Philippe Marguinaud
--- Comment #23 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-05 09:24
---
Additional new warning:
intrinsics/iso_c_binding.c: In Function "__iso_c_binding_c_f_pointer_u0":
libgfortran/intrinsics/iso_c_binding.c:112:20: Warning: "ub" may be used
uninitialized in this function
--
fx
--- Comment #22 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-05 09:23
---
*** Bug 40545 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #21 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-14 09:06
---
There's still a bunch of warnings:
../../../trunk/libgfortran/io/list_read.c: In function nml_read_obj:
../../../trunk/libgfortran/io/list_read.c:2345:5: warning: case value 6 not
in enumerated type bt
../
--- Comment #20 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-27 01:22
---
Subject: Bug 22423
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed May 27 01:21:22 2009
New Revision: 147887
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147887
Log:
2009-05-23 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from main
--- Comment #19 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-07 22:03
---
We're left with the following:
../../../trunk/libgfortran/io/list_read.c: In function nml_read_obj:
../../../trunk/libgfortran/io/list_read.c:2464: warning: comparison between
bt and enum
../../../trunk/l
--- Comment #18 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-07 21:42
---
Subject: Bug 22423
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Thu May 7 21:42:22 2009
New Revision: 147254
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147254
Log:
PR fortran/22423
* io/transfer.c (read
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-03 19:29
---
There is a warning in list_read.c left over from the big IO patch that was
merged in.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22423
--- Comment #16 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-03 16:28
---
Many new warnings:
../../../trunk/libgfortran/runtime/string.c: In function compare0:
../../../trunk/libgfortran/runtime/string.c:39: warning: comparison between
signed and unsigned integer expressions
Fixed
--- Comment #15 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-27 15:00
---
Subject: Bug 22423
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Dec 27 15:00:10 2007
New Revision: 131204
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131204
Log:
2007-12-27 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #14 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-18 13:22
---
(In reply to comment #13)
> ../../../libgfortran/runtime/environ.c:312: warning: 'init_choice' defined but
> not used
> ../../../libgfortran/runtime/environ.c:339: warning: 'show_choice' defined but
> not used
T
--- Comment #13 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-07 21:48 ---
The current set of warnings is:
../../../libgfortran/runtime/backtrace.c:66: warning: 'local_strcasestr'
defined but not used
../../../libgfortran/runtime/environ.c:312: warning: 'init_choice' defined but
not used
../
--- Comment #12 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-04 08:32
---
Jerry sent me (on 2007-01-19) the following mail:
"Andrew Pinski had issues with this fix because it is covering up a problem
somewhere else. He said on IRC he may have time to look into this and get a
correct
--- Comment #11 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 19:32
---
(In reply to comment #10)
>So are you going to use the fix I proposed in comment 8?
Yes.
> Do you want me to
> submit it to the patch mailing list first?
No, it's been posted a few times already, and I've
--- Comment #10 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2007-01-18
19:18 ---
FX,
So are you going to use the fix I proposed in comment 8? Do you want me to
submit it to the patch mailing list first?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22423
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-18 17:45
---
Once that last warning is fixed, I'd really like libgfortran to be built with
-Werror by default, at least on linux systems (it's known to issue tons of
warnings on some non-C99 systems, so we can't make it the de
--- Comment #8 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-10-01
16:38 ---
FX,
I found a thread that discusses a simple fix...
http://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2004-10/0089.html
All we have to change is...
Index: io/list_read.c
==
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-01 07:43
---
Apart from the warnings in PR 26540, the situation is stable with the only
warning being:
../../../trunk/libgfortran/io/list_read.c: In function
list_formatted_read_scalar:
../../../trunk/libgfortran/io/list_re
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-20 03:30
---
Subject: Bug 22423
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat May 20 03:29:58 2006
New Revision: 113923
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113923
Log:
2006-05-19 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-20 02:56
---
I will fix the one in transfer.c as obvious.
I don't understand the issue in list_read.c I have a namelist patch pending
for that file so if someone could give me a hint I would be happy to fix that
as well.
-
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-19 17:05
---
Adding Jerry in CC list since he's likely to be the one who introduced the
warning in transfer.c :)
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-19 17:04
---
We currently have the following warnings when building libgfortran on
i686-linux:
../../../gcc/libgfortran/io/transfer.c: In function 'read_block':
../../../gcc/libgfortran/io/transfer.c:279: warning: 'return' wi
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-02 18:00 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
>
> ../../../gcc/libgfortran/io/read.c: In function 'read_f':
> ../../../gcc/libgfortran/io/read.c:624: warning: value computed is not used
>
> ../../../gcc/libgfortran/io/unit.c: In functi
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-24
13:14 ---
The list of warnings is not that long any more:
../../../gcc/libgfortran/io/list_read.c: In function 'list_formatted_read':
../../../gcc/libgfortran/io/list_read.c:1289: warning: argument 'len' might be
c
25 matches
Mail list logo