--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-29 05:12
---
Fixed on 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 00:26
---
Subject: Bug 25289
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 24 00:26:08 2006
New Revision: 115702
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115702
Log:
2006-07-24 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 00:19
---
Subject: Bug 25289
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 24 00:19:45 2006
New Revision: 115700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115700
Log:
2006-07-23 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 00:18
---
Subject: Bug 25289
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 24 00:17:52 2006
New Revision: 115698
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115698
Log:
2006-07-23 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-06-29 21:37 ---
Subject: Bug number PR25289
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00997.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-18 21:01
---
I am taking a shot at this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-10 17:52
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed. I guess this is because rec=n is transferred to the library as a
> gfc_integer_4, but it should be gfc_offset.
Yes, I was beginning to think about that, but it has strongly i
--- Comment #1 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-10 16:17 ---
Confirmed. I guess this is because rec=n is transferred to the library as a
gfc_integer_4, but it should be gfc_offset.
--
jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
