[Bug libfortran/26423] Error on binary I/O for large array

2006-02-23 Thread dir at lanl dot gov
--- Comment #6 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-02-23 13:55 --- Yes, this was working - this is from one of the programs that I used for testing while you were fixing the other I/O bugs - I am not sure when it broke - my test all combinations of I/O program, which you once silenced, is ,now

[Bug libfortran/26423] Error on binary I/O for large array

2006-02-22 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 02:24 --- Well its at the 8192 boundary again similar to pr25835. In that case we needed to flush the buffers at the end of a read. I will look further. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26423

[Bug libfortran/26423] Error on binary I/O for large array

2006-02-22 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 02:12 --- Thought we had this fixed. Will have to look again. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26423

[Bug libfortran/26423] Error on binary I/O for large array

2006-02-22 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 20:50 --- Confirmed on i686-linux (trunk) too: $ cat testio.f integer :: a(8476) a(1) = 1 write(2) a a(1) = 2 write(2) a rewind 2 read(2) a write(*,*) a(1) read(2) a

[Bug libfortran/26423] Error on binary I/O for large array

2006-02-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 18:11 --- But not with 4.2.0 on x86_64-linux so confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/26423] Error on binary I/O for large array

2006-02-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 18:10 --- Hmm, this worked in 4.0.3 at least on x86_64-linux-gnu. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26423