--- Comment #43 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 18:16
---
No feedback in 3 months and gfortran is known to build just fine on
sparc-solaris (using working GMP).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #44 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-08-15 18:23 ---
This entire problem stems from having:
--enable-thread-safe
when building MPFR on Solaris. I finally got gcc 4.0.3 to build gfortran for
me last week after fixing that configure line to MPFR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.o
--- Comment #39 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 09:53
---
> I've also been poking at MPFR. There are apparently 10 or more patches now
> for
> 2.2.0, that may resolve the issues, too. I'll look at that. I've rebuilt it,
> and ran the "check" area for mpfr, and 115/1
--- Comment #40 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 10:54
---
This is the build with GMP 4.1.3 and MPFR 2.2.0:
gax% gcc/xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
Configured with: /home/eric/svn/gcc-4_0-branch/configure
--prefix=/opt/build/eric/local/gcc-4_
--- Comment #41 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-19 16:51
---
I'm puzzled by this PR and PR 26893: what is the status on those reports? Did
you reproduce this on a given platform, with *known good* GMP and MPFR and with
a gfortran >= 4.1 ?
Otherwise, I supposed we might cl
--- Comment #42 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-05-19 17:09 ---
I will be working on this after the students leave, starting in June. Please
keep this ticket open.
I note that the versions of GMP & MPFR I'm using work *fine* on linux, so I
consider them "known good". They only do
--- Comment #30 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-30 16:48 ---
Here is what happens when I run it by hand:
solaris8-build:/afs/ir/src/pubsw/languages/gcc-build/sun4x_58/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libgfortran>
/bin/ksh ../../../../gcc-4.0.3/libgfortran/mk-sik-inc.sh
'/afs/ir.stanford.edu
--- Comment #31 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 16:52
---
> No errors or anything... It just spits out the broken bits.
OK. Could you then break apart the script and run the various pieces manually?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26889
--- Comment #32 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-30 17:10 ---
Okay, I created the following file (as is generated by the script):
solaris8-build:/tmp> cat /tmp/q1.f90
integer (kind=1) :: x
end
Then ran the build command on it as is done by the script:
/afs/ir.stanford.edu/
--- Comment #33 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-30 17:17 ---
GDB shows:
GNU gdb 6.3
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain condit
--- Comment #34 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 17:35
---
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x0035c398 in mpfr_set_default_prec ()
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x0035c398 in mpfr_set_default_prec ()
OK. Could you ditch MPFR 2.2.0 entirely and use the MPFR l
--- Comment #35 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-30 17:40 ---
>From the GMP 4.2 NEWS file:
Mis-features:
* mpfr is gone, and will from now on be released only separately. Please see
www.mpfr.org.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26889
--- Comment #36 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-30 17:48 ---
Just to note, if I haven't already, I was able to build gcc 4.0.3 with GMP 4.2
and MPFR 2.2.0 on i386 and amd64 without a problem (including fortran), so this
seems to be a problem specific to Solaris 8/9.
--
http:
--- Comment #37 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 18:48
---
> From the GMP 4.2 NEWS file:
>
> Mis-features:
> * mpfr is gone, and will from now on be released only separately. Please
> see
> www.mpfr.org.
Grumpf... Could you downgrade to 4.1.x then?
--
ht
--- Comment #38 from quanah at stanford dot edu 2006-03-30 21:18 ---
Yeah, I'll give that a shot next week (i'm now in a freeze period).
I've also been poking at MPFR. There are apparently 10 or more patches now for
2.2.0, that may resolve the issues, too. I'll look at that. I've reb
15 matches
Mail list logo
