--- Comment #26 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 22:53
---
I think pack and unpack are OK now.
Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #25 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-20 22:11 ---
Can you summarize what it left to do?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32972
--- Comment #24 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-14 18:51
---
Subject: Bug 32972
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Apr 14 18:50:57 2008
New Revision: 134286
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134286
Log:
2008-04-14 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #23 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-13 20:16
---
Subject: Bug 32972
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Apr 13 20:15:58 2008
New Revision: 134245
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134245
Log:
2008-04-13 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fran
--- Comment #22 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-28 23:23
---
Subject: Bug 32972
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Mar 28 23:22:49 2008
New Revision: 133702
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133702
Log:
2008-03-28 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #21 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-23 22:20
---
Subject: Bug 32972
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 23 22:19:19 2008
New Revision: 133469
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133469
Log:
2007-03-23 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR l
--- Comment #20 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-21 15:33
---
Subject: Bug 32972
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Mar 21 15:33:13 2008
New Revision: 133428
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133428
Log:
2008-03-21 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #19 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-21 14:37
---
Subject: Bug 32972
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Mar 21 14:37:03 2008
New Revision: 133427
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133427
Log:
2008-03-21 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #18 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-20 11:58
---
(In reply to comment #16)
> gfortran.dg/internal_pack_3.f90 looks invalid and fails:
Again, thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32972
--- Comment #17 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-20 10:54
---
Subject: Bug 32972
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Mar 20 10:54:04 2008
New Revision: 133368
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133368
Log:
2008-03-20 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #16 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-03-20 09:54 ---
gfortran.dg/internal_pack_3.f90 looks invalid and fails:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/internal_pack_3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
WARNING: gfortran.dg/internal_pack_3.f90 -O0 compilation failed to produce
executable
F
--- Comment #15 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-19 16:58
---
(In reply to comment #13)
> There is a typo in libgfortran/runtime/in_pack_generic.c:
Fixed.
Thanks a lot for catching that one, Dominique! I would have
hated to break bootstrap.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Comment #14 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-19 16:57
---
Subject: Bug 32972
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Mar 19 16:56:22 2008
New Revision: 133345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133345
Log:
2008-03-19 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #13 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-03-19 16:48 ---
There is a typo in libgfortran/runtime/in_pack_generic.c:
--- ../_gcc_clean/libgfortran/runtime/in_pack_generic.c 2008-03-19
16:56:42.0 +0100
+++ ../gcc-4.4-work/libgfortran/runtime/in_pack_generic.c 2
--- Comment #12 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-19 15:43
---
Subject: Bug 32972
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Mar 19 15:42:55 2008
New Revision: 133344
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133344
Log:
2008-03-19 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #11 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-19 09:26
---
Here's something for internal_pack and internal_unpack:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg01121.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32972
--- Comment #10 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2007-12-09 10:33 ---
Subject: Re: performance of pack/unpack
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 21:57 +, jvdelisle at verizon dot net wrote:
>
> --- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2007-12-08 21:57 ---
> Subject: Re: perf
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2007-12-08 21:57 ---
Subject: Re: performance of pack/unpack
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> we could make specific versions of all those intrinsic that
> currently use memcpy(), including pack.
>
> Should we leave this bug open
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-08 21:30
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> we could make specific versions of all those intrinsic that
> currently use memcpy(), including pack.
Thomas, your patch for this bug produces warnings when building libgfortran
(see th
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-08 20:26 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Thomas, is this patch the final on this?
Hi Jerry,
we could make specific versions of all those intrinsic that
currently use memcpy(), including pack.
Should we leave this bug open for t
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-08 18:30
---
Thomas, is this patch the final on this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32972
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-24 16:16 ---
Subject: Bug 32972
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Aug 24 16:16:16 2007
New Revision: 127774
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127774
Log:
2007-08-24 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fo
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-16 18:16 ---
Hi Dominique,
would you be willing to give the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-08/msg00295.html
a spin on your Mac to check whether this is OK? That would
be great, because I don't have a big-endian s
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-11 20:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=14055)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14055&action=view)
proposed patch
Here's a patch, which is currently regtesting.
We'll absolutely need to check this on a big-end
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 20:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=14051)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14051&action=view)
partial patch
Partial patch (doesn't yet remove the conversion of logical(kind=1)
and logical(kind=2) mask argu
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 20:58 ---
Hi FX,
I just thought you'd like to be in the loop for this one.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
26 matches
Mail list logo
