http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33905
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-17 20:17 ---
I think that FX was right, since Toon has not responded in 6 months.
Entering a WONTFIX
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from toon at moene dot org 2009-12-17 21:58 ---
(Even with a temporary file, other things can go wrong!)
Paul, you are right - I agree with FX, but forgot to reply.
Closing as WONTFIX is OK with me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33905
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-13 09:03
---
Frankly, this is a snag in a non-default debugging feature in rare conditions;
that has to be a third-order enhancement request, at least! :) We cannot
provide completely foolproof debugging capablities anyway:
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-29 09:18
---
Toon, do you have an example that shows this happening?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33905
--- Comment #2 from toon at moene dot org 2009-03-29 13:36 ---
I'll try to come up with a bug report this week (the original case is much to
complicated to use as an example).
However, it might take some time and it also might be system dependent to
trigger this event.
It's clear,
