[Bug libfortran/45436] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-08-29 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-29 17:39 --- The commit fixes it for me. Sorry about this! -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/45436] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-08-28 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-28 07:35 --- Subject: Bug 45436 Author: fxcoudert Date: Sat Aug 28 07:35:10 2010 New Revision: 163611 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163611 Log: PR fortran/45436 * trans-types.c

[Bug libfortran/45436] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-08-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45436

[Bug libfortran/45436] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-08-27 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 23:39 --- I believe that it is related to r163597. During the build of libgfortran, the file kinds.h is generated. This file now has GFC_REAL_10 and GFC_REAL_16 typedef'd to 'long double'. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug libfortran/45436] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-08-27 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 23:47 --- FX, I've added you to this pr because I think your recent patch to start integration of the REAL(16) code is the cause. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug libfortran/45436] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-08-27 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-28 00:25 --- Reverting 163597 fixes the problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45436