[Bug libfortran/46584] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2010-12-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/46584] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2010-12-06 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-06 20:10:36 UTC --- > I think the PR can be closed after confirmation that the failure is gone. OK on the SPARC: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-12/msg00514.html Thanks.

[Bug libfortran/46584] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2010-12-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-04 13:13:51 UTC --- The committed patch removed the complex math functions from the quad_1.f90 test. I think the PR can be closed after confirmation that the failure is gone. Regarding hppa64-hp-hpux: I

[Bug libfortran/46584] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2010-12-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-04 13:08:15 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Dec 4 13:08:12 2010 New Revision: 167455 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167455 Log: 2010-12-04 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/46

[Bug libfortran/46584] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2010-11-26 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-26 21:28:52 UTC --- On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca wrote: > I needed to add __float128 type and some builtins. To do this, I __float128 should only be present where

[Bug libfortran/46584] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2010-11-26 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 --- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-26 19:04:56 UTC --- On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 > > --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-26 > 08:04:50

[Bug libfortran/46584] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2010-11-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-26 13:45:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Same problem on SPARC/Solaris 8 and 9 (but not 10). SPARC has quad precision > floating point support but Solaris 8 and 9 aren't C99; only Solaris 10 is. T

[Bug libfortran/46584] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2010-11-26 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa64-hp-hpux11.11, |

[Bug libfortran/46584] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2010-11-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-26 08:04:50 UTC --- The test case quad_1.f90 does not always use quad precision (despite its name) but it uses the highest available floating point type. Depending on the system that can be the real kind

[Bug libfortran/46584] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2010-11-25 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment