http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-06
20:10:36 UTC ---
> I think the PR can be closed after confirmation that the failure is gone.
OK on the SPARC: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-12/msg00514.html
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-04
13:13:51 UTC ---
The committed patch removed the complex math functions from the quad_1.f90
test.
I think the PR can be closed after confirmation that the failure is gone.
Regarding hppa64-hp-hpux: I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-04
13:08:15 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Dec 4 13:08:12 2010
New Revision: 167455
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167455
Log:
2010-12-04 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-26 21:28:52 UTC ---
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca wrote:
> I needed to add __float128 type and some builtins. To do this, I
__float128 should only be present where
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-26 19:04:56 UTC ---
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584
>
> --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-26
> 08:04:50
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-26
13:45:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Same problem on SPARC/Solaris 8 and 9 (but not 10). SPARC has quad precision
> floating point support but Solaris 8 and 9 aren't C99; only Solaris 10 is.
T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa64-hp-hpux11.11,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-26
08:04:50 UTC ---
The test case quad_1.f90 does not always use quad precision (despite its name)
but it uses the highest available floating point type. Depending on the system
that can be the real kind
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
10 matches
Mail list logo