http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-07-04
14:27:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Created attachment 24583 [details]
> More tests for rounding
>
> If it helps, I added some more tests for this.
>
> By removing the code lines in questio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #27 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-06-27
23:27:23 UTC ---
Status: I have not disappeared. I have a couple of other small projects to get
out of the way. I did find a bit of a conflict in our code. Two snippets that
were canceling each oth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #26 from Thomas Henlich
2011-06-23 06:13:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 24583
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24583
More tests for rounding
If it helps, I added some more tests for this.
By removing the code lines
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #25 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-06-21
02:51:14 UTC ---
yes I already found that. Just something stupid I did for one of the test
cases now in round_3.f90. I will be fixing this in due time. It's what I get
when I try to do things in a h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #24 from Thomas Henlich
2011-06-20 07:15:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> This is kind of bad:
>
> print "(RU,F7.0)", 7500.0 ! 8. expected 7500.
> print "(RD,F7.0)", -7500.0 ! -8. expected -7500.
I've traced the bug down to th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #23 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-06-17 13:32:33 UTC ---
For 'gcc version 4.6.0 20110313 (experimental) [trunk revision 170921p5] (GCC)'
I get
7501.
-7501.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #22 from Thomas Henlich
2011-06-17 13:22:42 UTC ---
This is kind of bad:
print "(RU,F7.0)", 7500.0 ! 8. expected 7500.
print "(RD,F7.0)", -7500.0 ! -8. expected -7500.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-05-06
20:07:39 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk, holding for backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-05-05
01:19:33 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu May 5 01:19:30 2011
New Revision: 173408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173408
Log:
2011-05-04 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-05-05
01:23:50 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu May 5 01:23:46 2011
New Revision: 173409
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173409
Log:
2011-05-04 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
--- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-05-04
16:49:17 UTC ---
Ne patch submitted to list for approval.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-05/msg00022.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Invalid UP rounding with F |Invalid UP/DOWN rounding
14 matches
Mail list logo