http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #20 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-06
22:18:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
--- ../../libgfortran/io/list_read.c(Revision 183913)
@@ -2206,3 +2211,4 @@ nml_parse_qualifier (st_parameter_dt *dt
@@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #19 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-05
23:00:16 UTC ---
I think the patch suggested in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-07/msg00252.html is actually correct - which
then fixes the issue of comment 18.
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-27
17:45:10 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Jul 27 17:45:01 2011
New Revision: 176839
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176839
Log:
2011-07-27 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-27
21:35:15 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Jul 27 21:35:08 2011
New Revision: 176850
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176850
Log:
2011-07-27 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-28
05:39:00 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Jul 28 05:38:54 2011
New Revision: 176857
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176857
Log:
2011-07-28 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-28
05:47:39 UTC ---
The issue of the original report (comment 0) is now fixed for GCC 4.4 to the
trunk (4.7): The vendor extension extended array read of normal arrays in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-23
10:27:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
New Revision: 176661
This commit fixes the original issue. A more special case still fails,
cf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-23
15:26:09 UTC ---
Several years ago, I sketched out a flow chart for all of namelist so I could
walk the logic and see what to do. I think we need to do this again and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-22
13:49:59 UTC ---
After reviewing the listread.c and the test case I see that the touched should
have nothing to do with this test case since the case has nothing to do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-22
22:44:24 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jul 22 22:44:20 2011
New Revision: 176661
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=176661
Log:
2011-07-23 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-21
18:32:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Jerry what do you think? I have to admit that I have not the slightest idea
what ionml-touched does - thus, I cannot come up of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-22
01:28:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #3)
If the bug reporter can, I think he should convert all the input files to
the
Fortran 90 syntax
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-20
16:16:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Why are you calling this a workaround. It looks like it is fixing
a bug in the user's program.
In an ideal world, all code would
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-07-20 17:15:19 UTC ---
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:18:01PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-20
17:24:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
The undocumented extension cannot be flagged by any combination of
-Wall, -Wextra, -fcheck=all, -Wsurprising and/or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #6 from Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst at gmail dot com
2011-07-20 21:09:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
If the bug reporter can, I think he should convert all the input files to the
Fortran 90 syntax of namelists.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-07-20 21:22:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
If the bug reporter can, I think he should convert all the input
files to the Fortran 90 syntax of namelists. However,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-20
21:53:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165979
PR libgfortran/46010
The problem is that dtp-u.p.ionml-touched
21 matches
Mail list logo
