[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-09-15 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-09-07 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- > Author: jvdelisle > Date: Tue Sep 6 23:22:26 2016 > New Revision: 240018 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240018&root=gcc&view=rev >

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-09-06 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Sep 6 23:22:26 2016 New Revision: 240018 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240018&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-09-06 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortran/77393 * i

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-09-06 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 39577 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39577&action=edit Patch for testing, fixes comment #2? This patch for testing. I have tested on x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.0 whic

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-09-05 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #10) > The test FAILs on Solaris (both sparc and x86, both 32 and 64-bit): > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_f0_2.f90 -O0 execution test > FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_f0_2.f90 -

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-09-05 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10 from

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-09-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Can you test by changing the define in write.c line 1349: > > #define BUF_STACK_SZ 256 On x86_64-apple-darwin15 the threshold (minimal value without SIGSEGV) is 385 with -m64 and 596 with -m32.

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-09-02 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > > Works for me here! > > Are you sure that you have tested > > print "(f8.0)", huge(1.0) > print "(f18.0)", huge(1.0_8) > print "(f20.0)", huge(1.0_10) >

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-09-01 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Works for me here! Are you sure that you have tested print "(f8.0)", huge(1.0) print "(f18.0)", huge(1.0_8) print "(f20.0)", huge(1.0_10) print "(f40.0)", huge(1.0_16) end ?

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-09-01 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- The update to the test case should correct any platform specific KIND issues. May need to upsize the bufers a little for Dominique's issue. I set the buffers tight so we could catch different behaviors on p

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-09-01 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Sep 1 21:17:42 2016 New Revision: 239945 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239945&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-09-01 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortran/77393 * gf

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-09-01 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > At revision r239908 the second test in comment 0 still gives > > > ** > > Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault -

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-09-01 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- At revision r239908 the second test in comment 0 still gives ** Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference. at run time.

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-08-31 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Aug 31 17:54:32 2016 New Revision: 239901 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239901&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-31 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortran/77393 * gf

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-08-31 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 --- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Aug 31 17:45:26 2016 New Revision: 239900 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239900&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-31 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortran/77393 * io

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-08-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug libfortran/77393] [7 Regression] Revision r237735 changed the behavior of F0.0

2016-08-26 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|