https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87048
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon ---
I've attached the execution traces from PR25829 here for clarity.
Looking at them, I've noticed a different execution path in
build.4947.constprop.0, starting at line 5477 in the "OK" file, and line 5483
i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87048
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 45229
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45229&action=edit
execution trace of KO static binary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87048
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 45228
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45228&action=edit
execution trace of OK static binary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87048
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
Looks like there was a misunderstanding, I was probably not clear.
r263082 actually removed the regression I reported, because that commit reverts
the offending one. So current trunk is OK.
I'm looking ag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87048
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87048
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||armeb
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87048
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||25829
Target Milestone|---
