--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-04-20 15:56
---
Ziga, please let us know as soon as your FSF paperwork clears. Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
--- Additional Comments From ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si 2005-04-20
16:24 ---
Bryce,
about a month ago, I was informed that my papers were to be sent shortly. I
forgot about it later, but I poked the copyright clerk now.
Let me know if there's anything I can do to speed things u
--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-05-04 14:28
---
Any news here?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
--- Additional Comments From ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si 2005-05-04
15:01 ---
My copyright papers were resent and arrived successfully this time. This was
about a week ago (and I returned them immediately) so I expect the confirmation
Real Soon Now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16 16:03
---
The paperwork cleared with the FSF.
There was a glitch in the new "fully-automatic" system.
Apologies.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16
19:02 ---
Subject: Bug 20504
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-16 19:01:52
Modified files:
libjava: ChangeLog
libjava/gnu/regexp
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16
19:03 ---
Subject: Bug 20504
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-16 19:03:02
Modified files:
libjava: Change
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16
19:06 ---
I checked this in everywhere.
Thanks for taking the time to write the test cases, that is excellent.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si 2005-05-16
19:18 ---
> I checked this in everywhere.
I was about to go through the procedure myself, but thanks anyway.
There was a typo in my initial ChangeLog entry though:
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
2005-03-17 Ziga Mahkovec <[EM
--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-03-16 21:50
---
Created an attachment (id=8406)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8406&action=view)
Patch for quoting constructs (from Ziga's CP bug)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20504
--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-03-16 21:51
---
Created an attachment (id=8407)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8407&action=view)
Mauve test cases for java.util.regex (from Ziga's CP bug)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-03-16 22:27
---
The patch looks reasonable to me. Is the quoting feature something that should
be used in Perl style regular expressions as well, or is this a difference
between Perl-style and Java-style? If it is a difference,
--- Additional Comments From ziga dot mahkovec at klika dot si 2005-03-17
00:33 ---
The quoting constructs are used in Perl as well [1]:
"\Q quote (disable) pattern metacharacters till \E"
I'm attaching the ChangeLog entry. And my GNU Classpath copyright assignment is
in processing.
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-03-17 01:29
---
Please make sure the ChangeLog is properly formatted. You're missing the name of
the changed method, and a "*" beside the filename. We're quite picky about this
;-)
Otherwise, the patch looks great. Please che
14 matches
Mail list logo
