[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

2005-05-03 Thread overholt at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 21:24 --- Created an attachment (id=8810) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8810action=view) test case part 1 Run this part first. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21372

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

2005-05-03 Thread overholt at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 21:28 --- Created an attachment (id=8811) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8811action=view) test case part 1 Run this file and leave it running while you try to run the second attachment (forthcoming).

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

2005-05-03 Thread overholt at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 21:29 --- Created an attachment (id=8812) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8812action=view) second part to the test case Run this while TestLocking2 is running. --

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

2005-05-03 Thread overholt at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 21:44 --- Created an attachment (id=8813) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8813action=view) patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21372

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

2005-05-03 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 21:54 --- This patch looks good to me. Could you write a ChangeLog entry for it? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21372

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

2005-05-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 21:56 --- (In reply to comment #5) This patch looks good to me. Could you write a ChangeLog entry for it? He did in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q2/msg00371.html Confirmed, -- What

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

2005-05-03 Thread mckinlay at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-05-03 21:57 --- There is already a ChangeLog entry with the patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21372

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

2005-05-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 22:38 --- Subject: Bug 21372 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 22:38:17 Modified files: libjava: ChangeLog

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

2005-05-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 22:47 --- Subject: Bug 21372 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-03 22:47:13 Modified files: libjava:

[Bug libgcj/21372] FileChannel.tryLock() return value incorrect

2005-05-03 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 22:48 --- I checked in the fix to the trunk, the 4.0 branch, and Classpath. Thanks for the clear test case and patch. -- What|Removed |Added