[Bug libgcj/32465] Linking 64-bit libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86: non-PIC code despite -fPIC

2007-07-03 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-03 18:11 --- Created an attachment (id=13840) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13840&action=view) runtime.s built with gcj 4.3.0 20070618 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32465

[Bug libgcj/32465] Linking 64-bit libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86: non-PIC code despite -fPIC

2007-07-03 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-03 18:10 --- Created an attachment (id=13839) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13839&action=view) runtime.s built with gcj 4.2.1 20070611 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32465

[Bug libgcj/32465] Linking 64-bit libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86: non-PIC code despite -fPIC

2007-06-25 Thread ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
--- Comment #3 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2007-06-25 17:38 --- Subject: Re: Linking 64-bit libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86: non-PIC code despite -fPIC hjl at lucon dot org writes: > --- Comment #2 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-06-22 18:26 --- > On Linux,

[Bug libgcj/32465] Linking 64-bit libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86: non-PIC code despite -fPIC

2007-06-22 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #2 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-06-22 18:26 --- On Linux, I got 02e1b960 1 OBJECT LOCAL HIDDEN 25 gnu::gcj::runtime::FinalizerThread::finalizer_ready It looks like assembler/linker on Solaris don't have proper visibility support. BTW, the last symbol visi