[Bug libgcj/35950] jar produces files ecj won't handle

2008-04-17 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-17 17:16 --- Subject: Bug 35950 Author: tromey Date: Thu Apr 17 17:15:10 2008 New Revision: 134401 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134401 Log: PR libgcj/35950: *

[Bug libgcj/35950] jar produces files ecj won't handle

2008-04-17 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-17 17:16 --- Subject: Bug 35950 Author: tromey Date: Thu Apr 17 17:16:09 2008 New Revision: 134402 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134402 Log: PR libgcj/35950: *

[Bug libgcj/35950] jar produces files ecj won't handle

2008-04-17 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-17 17:18 --- Fixed on 4.3 branch and trunk. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/35950] jar produces files ecj won't handle

2008-04-16 Thread gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
--- Comment #1 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-04-16 22:21 --- The difference is noticeable just from the zip output. This is the working tools.zip created by fastjar: 0 04-16-08 03:08 gnu/classpath/tools/tnameserv/ 2391 04-16-08 03:08

[Bug libgcj/35950] jar produces files ecj won't handle

2008-04-16 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-16 22:30 --- If you know of a specific gjar patch, I can pull it over. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/35950] jar produces files ecj won't handle

2008-04-16 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-16 22:32 --- Never mind, I see it now. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/35950] jar produces files ecj won't handle

2008-04-16 Thread gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
--- Comment #4 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-04-16 23:34 --- I recall there was a CP one that was fixed, but can't seem to find it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35950