[Bug libgcj/44216] [4.6 regression] All libjava tests fail on IRIX 6.5: ld warns about -no-merge-exidx-entries

2010-06-11 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-11 11:49 --- Subject: Bug 44216 Author: ro Date: Fri Jun 11 11:49:16 2010 New Revision: 160603 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160603 Log: config: * override.m4 (AC_LANG_WERROR): Redefine to au

[Bug libgcj/44216] [4.6 regression] All libjava tests fail on IRIX 6.5: ld warns about -no-merge-exidx-entries

2010-06-11 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-11 11:46 --- Subject: Bug 44216 Author: ro Date: Fri Jun 11 11:45:59 2010 New Revision: 160602 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160602 Log: Backport from mainline: 2010-05-25 Rainer Orth

[Bug libgcj/44216] [4.6 regression] All libjava tests fail on IRIX 6.5: ld warns about -no-merge-exidx-entries

2010-05-25 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-25 17:01 --- Fixed for 4.6.0. -- ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug libgcj/44216] [4.6 regression] All libjava tests fail on IRIX 6.5: ld warns about -no-merge-exidx-entries

2010-05-25 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-25 17:00 --- Subject: Bug 44216 Author: ro Date: Tue May 25 16:59:45 2010 New Revision: 159833 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159833 Log: PR libgcj/44216 * configure.ac (libgcj_cv_exidx): Enabl

[Bug libgcj/44216] [4.6 regression] All libjava tests fail on IRIX 6.5: ld warns about -no-merge-exidx-entries

2010-05-25 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-25 16:55 --- Mine. -- ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc do

[Bug libgcj/44216] [4.6 regression] All libjava tests fail on IRIX 6.5: ld warns about -no-merge-exidx-entries

2010-05-25 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2010-05-25 16:21 --- The patch needs a fat comment saying what's going on, then it should be okay. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44216

[Bug libgcj/44216] [4.6 regression] All libjava tests fail on IRIX 6.5: ld warns about -no-merge-exidx-entries

2010-05-25 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-25 16:14 --- Created an attachment (id=20745) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20745&action=view) proposed patch This patch worked for me. It's a hack in that it does the save and restore using lowlevel autoconf i

[Bug libgcj/44216] [4.6 regression] All libjava tests fail on IRIX 6.5: ld warns about -no-merge-exidx-entries

2010-05-21 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-05-21 09:26 --- Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] All libjava tests fail on IRIX 6.5: ld warns about -no-merge-exidx-entries > --- Comment #3 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-21 08:15 --- > (In reply to comm

[Bug libgcj/44216] [4.6 regression] All libjava tests fail on IRIX 6.5: ld warns about -no-merge-exidx-entries

2010-05-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-21 08:15 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Ralf, maybe we want in Autoconf (and hence in override.m4) a mechanism to > push/pop the AC_LANG_WERROR state? Isn't there such a mechanism already? If not, then there was at least a propos

[Bug libgcj/44216] [4.6 regression] All libjava tests fail on IRIX 6.5: ld warns about -no-merge-exidx-entries

2010-05-21 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2010-05-21 07:27 --- What if you call AC_LANG_WERROR just before the test? This wouldn't be a final patch because then you need to restore the previous value, but it's a start. Ralf, maybe we want in Autoconf (and hence in override.m4) a mecha

[Bug libgcj/44216] [4.6 regression] All libjava tests fail on IRIX 6.5: ld warns about -no-merge-exidx-entries

2010-05-20 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 18:23 --- Paolo, do you happen to have an idea how to handle this cleanly? -- ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --