[Bug libgomp/100390] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 -O execution test

2021-05-11 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100390 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/100390] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 -O execution test

2021-05-11 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100390 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/100390] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 -O execution test

2021-05-02 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100390 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- In combination with stress -c 5, I get more FAILs: ... $ for n in $(seq 1 100); do make check "RUNTESTFLAGS=fortran.exp=depobj-1.f90" 2>&1 | grep "expected passes"; done # of expected passes1 # of

[Bug libgomp/100390] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 -O execution test

2021-05-02 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100390 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Fails not very often (twice in a run of 100): ... $ for n in $(seq 1 100); do make check "RUNTESTFLAGS=fortran.exp=depobj-1.f90" 2>&1 | grep "expected passes"; done # of expected passes