[Bug libgomp/26651] [gomp] #omp for ordered leaks memory

2006-04-17 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 17:24 --- RTH, alas there seems to be some fallout: PR25874, PR25989. (I first blamed Jakub's patch for PR26823 for the fallout, but closer inspection showed that it's your patch instead.) Would you mind having a look?

[Bug libgomp/26651] [gomp] #omp for ordered leaks memory

2006-04-16 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 16:53 --- Fixed. -- rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libgomp/26651] [gomp] #omp for ordered leaks memory

2006-04-13 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 23:44 --- Subject: Bug 26651 Author: rth Date: Thu Apr 13 23:44:25 2006 New Revision: 112935 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112935 Log: PR 26651 * gimple-low.c (lower_omp_directive): Remove

[Bug libgomp/26651] [gomp] #omp for ordered leaks memory

2006-03-20 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-20 16:43 --- Failing to call GOMP_loop_end. -- rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgomp/26651] [gomp] #omp for ordered leaks memory

2006-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 15:59 --- Confirmed: ==25829== 68 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 1 ==25829==at 0x11B1E1FD: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:279) ==25829==by 0x11C232E0: gomp_malloc_cleared (alloc.c:48) ==25829==