--- Comment #15 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-06 18:48
---
Subject: Bug 30546
Author: dfranke
Date: Tue Feb 6 18:48:11 2007
New Revision: 121661
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121661
Log:
2007-02-07 Daniel Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #16 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-06 18:50
---
Subject: Bug 30546
Author: dfranke
Date: Tue Feb 6 18:49:55 2007
New Revision: 121662
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121662
Log:
2007-02-07 Daniel Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #17 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-06 18:54
---
Fixed in mainline and 4.2. Closing.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-31 21:29
---
Subject: Bug 30546
Author: dfranke
Date: Wed Jan 31 21:29:19 2007
New Revision: 121439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121439
Log:
2007-01-31 Daniel Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #14 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-31 21:30
---
Subject: Bug 30546
Author: dfranke
Date: Wed Jan 31 21:30:16 2007
New Revision: 121440
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121440
Log:
2007-01-31 Daniel Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #12 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-30 09:15 ---
Subject: Bug number PR30546
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg02455.html
--
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-27 08:59
---
(In reply to comment #8)
So I still say we should just require makeinfo when building from
SVN/snapshot.
There is no reason not really.
Yes there are reasons: for example, makeinfo does not easily build on
--- Comment #10 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
2007-01-27 10:06 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
So I still say we should just require makeinfo when building from
SVN/snapshot.
There is no reason not really.
Yes there are reasons: for
--- Comment #11 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-27 13:46
---
When introducing this, I was in good faith that automake is capable to handle
any issues that may arise. Since the *.info files are not kept in SVN, as
`missing` seems to assume, the fail safe backfires.
I will
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-27 03:52 ---
This is a minor issue at best because it only happens when building from SVN or
a snapshot and not a release. Also we don't want to include the .info in svn
because they will then not get updated correctly when
10 matches
Mail list logo
