http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59337
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59337
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 16 15:33:42 2013
New Revision: 206017
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206017&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/59337
* openmp.c (resolve_omp_atomic): Adjust error messa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59337
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59337
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The standard doesn't allow it, and given the parsing complexities of the
atomics creating extensions there is IMHO undesirable, especially when it will
unlikely work with other compilers.
Because the standard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59337
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I wonder why atomic negate isn't possible - from a QOI perspective treating
it as 0 - i would be obvious, no?
