https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67303
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67303
--- Comment #4 from vondele at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vondele
Date: Mon Aug 24 12:17:07 2015
New Revision: 227122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227122&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/66761
PR libgomp/67303
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67303
--- Comment #3 from vondele at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vondele
Date: Mon Aug 24 11:01:25 2015
New Revision: 227119
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227119&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/66761
PR libgomp/67303
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67303
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67303
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is a partly false negative. In the sense the load from ws->start just
needs to be __atomic_load(&ws->start, RELAX) to be correct. This in it of
itself is the same as what it is correctly doing. Just r
