https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93515
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93515
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fdaf101b1dd46d6673a318139e9620c068f45a12
commit r8-10015-gfdaf101b1dd46d6673a318139e9620c068f45a12
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93515
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3266b1311723841ec553277f1fb6bfddef8809d
commit r9-8220-gd3266b1311723841ec553277f1fb6bfddef8809d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93515
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05fa0de35ec63db2c3aacd30cc34a7389b3c4e5d
commit r9-8221-g05fa0de35ec63db2c3aacd30cc34a7389b3c4e5d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93515
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb3f06480a17f98579704b9927632627a3814c5c
commit r10-6471-gcb3f06480a17f98579704b9927632627a3814c5c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93515
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf785618ecc90e3f063b99572de48cb91aa5ab5d
commit r10-6470-gcf785618ecc90e3f063b99572de48cb91aa5ab5d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93515
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The patch unfortunately regressed:
+FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/loop-5.c (internal compiler error)
+FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/loop-5.c (test for excess errors)
which looks like previously broken code on the testcas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93515
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93515
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Thanks for the report, confirmed. Simpler testcase:
#include
int
main ()
{
int i;
int a = 42;
#pragma omp target teams distribute parallel for defaultmap(tofrom: scalar)
for (i = 0; i < 64; ++i)