[Bug libitm/52042] libitm.c/clone-1.c (all darwin) and libitm.c/stackundo.c (darwin 11) execution tests fail with -fpie

2012-02-28 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042 m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libitm/52042] libitm.c/clone-1.c (all darwin) and libitm.c/stackundo.c (darwin 11) execution tests fail with -fpie

2012-02-15 Thread pmarlier at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042 --- Comment #10 from pmarlier at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-15 19:17:47 UTC --- Author: pmarlier Date: Wed Feb 15 19:17:42 2012 New Revision: 184281 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184281 Log: 2012-02-15 Iain Sandoe

[Bug libitm/52042] libitm.c/clone-1.c (all darwin) and libitm.c/stackundo.c (darwin 11) execution tests fail with -fpie

2012-02-07 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042 --- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07 18:17:33 UTC --- Yes, love to see a patch. I think the argument is important to get right, as otherwise the next bug to track down will be much harder to find (I call

[Bug libitm/52042] libitm.c/clone-1.c (all darwin) and libitm.c/stackundo.c (darwin 11) execution tests fail with -fpie

2012-02-07 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-02-07 21:15:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) While I haven't done a full bootstrap, applying the patch from comment 6 and remaking the current build reduces the libitm

[Bug libitm/52042] libitm.c/clone-1.c (all darwin) and libitm.c/stackundo.c (darwin 11) execution tests fail with -fpie

2012-02-07 Thread patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042 --- Comment #9 from Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com 2012-02-08 03:38:24 UTC --- Proposed fix here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00321.html All comments (and tests) are welcome! Thanks.

[Bug libitm/52042] libitm.c/clone-1.c (all darwin) and libitm.c/stackundo.c (darwin 11) execution tests fail with -fpie

2012-02-06 Thread patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com 2012-02-07 04:02:08 UTC --- Created attachment 26595 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26595 patch that seems to work for clone-1.c Hi guys, In fact, the

[Bug libitm/52042] libitm.c/clone-1.c (all darwin) and libitm.c/stackundo.c (darwin 11) execution tests fail with -fpie

2012-01-31 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin11 |*-apple-darwin*

[Bug libitm/52042] libitm.c/clone-1.c (all darwin) and libitm.c/stackundo.c (darwin 11) execution tests fail with -fpie

2012-01-31 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-01-31 17:54:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) on i686-darwin9: make check-target-libitm RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=unix/-fpie\{-m32,-m64\} clone-1 fails (m32, m64),