[Bug libmudflap/26446] Running large program compiled with mudflap aborts even before reaching main()

2013-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libmudflap/26446] Running large program compiled with mudflap aborts even before reaching main()

2012-10-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libmudflap/26446] Running large program compiled with mudflap aborts even before reaching main()

2012-10-24 Thread fche at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446 --- Comment #8 from Frank Ch. Eigler 2012-10-24 16:39:58 UTC --- Romain, good analysis.

[Bug libmudflap/26446] Running large program compiled with mudflap aborts even before reaching main()

2012-10-24 Thread romain.geissler at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at gmail

[Bug libmudflap/26446] Running large program compiled with mudflap aborts even before reaching main()

2012-02-08 Thread c.david86 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446 --- Comment #6 from Clément David 2012-02-08 13:49:53 UTC --- Created attachment 26611 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26611 Test case I'm able to reproduce with gcc 4.6.2 with a simple test case. The attached conftest.cpp c

[Bug libmudflap/26446] Running large program compiled with mudflap aborts even before reaching main()

2006-04-25 Thread walter dot zimmer at dlr dot de
--- Comment #5 from walter dot zimmer at dlr dot de 2006-04-25 14:05 --- > The link-time wrapping of malloc is designed precisely so that other > uninstrumented libraries that call malloc by name still get registered in the > libmudflap runtime. That way, pointers from these libraries

[Bug libmudflap/26446] Running large program compiled with mudflap aborts even before reaching main()

2006-04-22 Thread fche at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 from fche at redhat dot com 2006-04-22 15:37 --- (In reply to comment #3) > > I investigated further and found that it is not the size of the memory that > matters. The problem seems to be that we also use fortran code, which is not > mudflapped, but needs the gfortran li

[Bug libmudflap/26446] Running large program compiled with mudflap aborts even before reaching main()

2006-03-24 Thread walter dot zimmer at dlr dot de
--- Comment #3 from walter dot zimmer at dlr dot de 2006-03-24 16:57 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Mudflap needs memory to set up runtime data structures, so you simply need > more > (virtual) memory. I investigated further and found that it is not the size of the memory that matters.

[Bug libmudflap/26446] Running large program compiled with mudflap aborts even before reaching main()

2006-02-23 Thread walter dot zimmer at dlr dot de
--- Comment #2 from walter dot zimmer at dlr dot de 2006-02-23 17:43 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Mudflap needs memory to set up runtime data structures, so you simply need > more > (virtual) memory. Ok, I understand. Thanks! > cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 4038480 kB [...] Swap

[Bug libmudflap/26446] Running large program compiled with mudflap aborts even before reaching main()

2006-02-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 17:24 --- Mudflap needs memory to set up runtime data structures, so you simply need more (virtual) memory. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446