[Bug libobjc/49883] clang + gcc 4.6 runtime = broken

2011-10-14 Thread nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49883 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2

[Bug libobjc/49883] clang + gcc 4.6 runtime = broken

2011-10-14 Thread nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49883 --- Comment #4 from Nicola Pero 2011-10-14 17:19:15 UTC --- Author: nicola Date: Fri Oct 14 17:19:07 2011 New Revision: 179997 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179997 Log: In libobjc/: 2011-10-14 Nicola Pero Backport

[Bug libobjc/49883] clang + gcc 4.6 runtime = broken

2011-10-09 Thread nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49883 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libobjc/49883] clang + gcc 4.6 runtime = broken

2011-10-09 Thread nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49883 --- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-10-09 10:29:54 UTC --- Author: nicola Date: Sun Oct 9 10:29:50 2011 New Revision: 179721 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179721 Log: In libobjc/: 2011-10-09 Nicola Pero PR libob

[Bug libobjc/49883] clang + gcc 4.6 runtime = broken

2011-07-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49883 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-28 19:09:00 UTC --- I think we should declare this a bug in clang and not the runtime.