https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0d8d001d94166242be4387ca72fe0fc483860f1
commit r11-8613-gf0d8d001d94166242be4387ca72fe0fc483860f1
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bc7a522548c37daf612c2ba4c44e9ea93548ed45
commit r11-8612-gbc7a522548c37daf612c2ba4c44e9ea93548ed45
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b87f3318cf6334a3a42dcf27f2fdec0fce04665
commit r12-1567-g2b87f3318cf6334a3a42dcf27f2fdec0fce04665
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f4a2fb44dad6c9c140226fc19ed16109b85e6f4
commit r12-1566-g0f4a2fb44dad6c9c140226fc19ed16109b85e6f4
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to TC from comment #7)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #6)
> >
> > For the other adaptors, we still unconditionally disable perfect forwarding
> > call wrapper semantics. I'm not sure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #7 from TC ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #6)
>
> For the other adaptors, we still unconditionally disable perfect forwarding
> call wrapper semantics. I'm not sure if the performance/diagnostic tradeoff
> is worth it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to TC from comment #4)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> > Good point, confirmed. Though I'm not sure if perfect forwarding here is
> > strictly necessary to fix this testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from TC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #1)
> It seems that before r12-1184, the solution to PR100577 can be simply to
> remove const && delete operator(). The reason is that const & and &&
> overloads themselves are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
It seems that before r12-1184, the solution to PR100577 can be simply to remove
const && delete operator(). The reason is that const & and && overloads
themselves are constrained, and if _Rhs meets __pipe_invocable,
14 matches
Mail list logo
