https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102882
Bug ID: 102882 Summary: [AIX] 23_containers 96088 testsuite failures Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The 96088 testcases are failing on AIX. Does this testcase require overriding operator new[] in the library itself, not only the testcase? The default build options for libstdc++ on AIX do not permit operator overloading. Maybe it requires XFAIL on AIX. /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/960 88.cc:42: void test01(): Assertion '__gnu_test::counter::count() == 3' failed. operator new is called operator new is called FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/96088.cc execution test /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/unordered_map/960 88.cc:42: void test01(): Assertion '__gnu_test::counter::count() == 3' failed. operator new is called operator new is called FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_map/96088.cc execution test /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/unordered_multima p/96088.cc:43: void test01(): Assertion '__gnu_test::counter::count() == 3' fail ed. operator new is called operator new is called FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_multimap/96088.cc execution test /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/unordered_multise t/96088.cc:43: void test01(): Assertion '__gnu_test::counter::count() == 3' fail ed. operator new is called operator new is called FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_multiset/96088.cc execution test