https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
Bug 104772 depends on bug 99708, which changed state.
Bug 99708 Summary: __SIZEOF_FLOAT128__ not defined on powerpc64le-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99708
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6261d10521f9fdc2a43d54b4dc365025288aa8e9
commit r14-1582-g6261d10521f9fdc2a43d54b4dc365025288aa8e9
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And the reason for the helper functions is C++11 which would not like
temporaries in constexpr functions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sorry, 0x1.0p-1016 * 0x1.0p-1016 * 0x1.0p-1016 obviously should have been
0x1.0p+1016 * 0x1.0p+1016 * 0x1.0p+1016, I tested it on a testcase where I used
different names etc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Dunno.
I think you can add support even without any compiler changes, at least if
_GLIBCXX_DOUBLE_IS_IEEE_BINARY64:
#ifdef __STRICT_ANSI__
static _GLIBCXX_CONSTEXPR __float128
min() _GLIBCXX_USE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.2|14.0
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f150a084e25eaa98afaf25e2211001047ecc8d44
commit r14-1433-gf150a084e25eaa98afaf25e2211001047ecc8d44
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That would be great :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|13.2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104772
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Strictly speaking, the __FLT128_* macros relate to _Float128 which is not
defined for C++ even when __float128 is (and in theory a target could have a
non-IEEE __float128 which would have different propert
14 matches
Mail list logo
